Tag Archives: Graduate Education

Journal of Public Relations Education, Vol. 12, Issue 1

Letter from the Special Issue Editors & Table of Contents

Emily S. Kinsky

Emily S. Kinsky
West Texas A&M University
Professor
Past Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Public Relations Education
Email: ekinsky@wtamu.edu

Chuck Lubbers

Chuck Lubbers
University of South Dakota
Professor
Past Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Public Relations Education
Email: chuck.lubbers@usd.edu

Adrienne A. Wallace
Grand Valley State University
Editor-in-Chief
Journal of Public Relations Education
Email: wallacad@gvsu.edu

Editors’ Note: “Elevating PR: Insights and Trends in Graduate Education” 

It is with tremendous honor and deep gratification that we introduce this special issue of the Journal of Public Relations Education, a collection of scholarly work that addresses a critical and timely gap in our field: the state of graduate education in public relations. This issue comes at a pivotal moment in our discipline, when the landscape of higher education is shifting, our industry is navigating technological disruption, and questions about the value and structure of advanced degrees are being asked with unprecedented urgency.

The Impetus for this Special Issue 

Since 1975, the Commission on Public Relations Education (CPRE) has maintained a steadfast commitment to studying and improving public relations education standards and practices. However, much of that effort has focused on undergraduate education and the crucial transition from the academy to the profession at the entry level. In 1999, the CPRE “Port of Entry” report established the university as the official pathway for those seeking to establish careers in public relations, recognizing both undergraduate and graduate education as essential “tooling and retooling centers” for the profession. Yet, despite the substantial growth in master’s-level public relations programs over the past decade, the last comprehensive CPRE report dedicated exclusively to graduate education was published in 2012, well over a decade ago. 

The intervening years have witnessed profound transformations. The global pandemic reshaped how we work and learn, fundamentally altering the pedagogy of graduate education. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged not merely as a technological tool but as a force reshaping job functions and competencies. The profession itself has fragmented and rebranded across multiple disciplines and specializations, such as strategic communication, integrated marketing communication, corporate communication, and beyond. Master’s programs have proliferated, diversified, and dispersed across various academic units and delivery models. In the face of this complexity and growth, the need for scholarly attention to graduate public relations education became undeniable. 

This special issue, titled “Elevating PR: Insights and Trends in Graduate Education,” was conceived to further bridge this pedagogical gap in tandem with the 2025 CPRE report and to spark contemporary dialogue about the future of graduate education in our field. We sought to invite research articles, teaching briefs, scholarly essays, and case studies that would explore both the challenges and opportunities inherent in graduate-level public relations education. The call extended an open invitation to examine how practitioner expectations align with graduate curricula, how best practices in internships and applied learning can be designed, how research and data analytical abilities are cultivated, and how graduate programs connect, or fail to connect, with the demands of contemporary professional practice. 

What This Issue Reveals 

The manuscripts brought together in this collection offer a multifaceted portrait of graduate public relations education in the United States, which expands upon the work recently published by the CPRE research committee in the Graduate Education in Public Relations: 2025 Report, released in November. Collectively, they represent the work of educators, researchers, and practitioners committed to understanding and improving the graduate student experience and, ultimately, the competency of the professionals our programs produce. 

Several critical themes emerge from this collection. First, the issue addresses the persistent challenge of curricular inconsistency and lack of standardization across graduate programs. Despite decades of recommendations from the Commission on Public Relations Education, programs continue to vary significantly in their structure, titles, course offerings, and culminating experiences. Some programs house themselves within journalism schools; others reside in business colleges, communication departments, or interdisciplinary centers. This fragmentation raises important questions about what prospective students can expect, what employers should anticipate, and how our field can signal its credibility and value. 

Second, this special issue grapples with the critical question of alignment—the alignment between what the industry needs and what our programs teach. The gap between employer expectations and graduate preparation surfaces repeatedly across these manuscripts. Practitioners emphasize the importance of writing proficiency, interpersonal communication, strategic thinking, and professional maturity in their graduate interns, yet many find these competencies underdeveloped. This disconnect demands our attention and our response. 

Third, these articles illuminate the reality of contemporary graduate student diversity—not only in terms of students’ demographic characteristics, but also in their goals, backgrounds, and contexts. Graduate programs now serve students pursuing doctoral degrees, career advancement in practice, and specialization in niche sectors. They serve full-time and part-time students, residential and online learners, career-changers and industry veterans. The “one-size-fits-all” approach to graduate education is no longer viable…if it ever was. 

Fourth, these research endeavors document important efforts to innovate pedagogically. From service-learning models that bridge community engagement with research methods training to intentional curriculum design informed by industry input, this issue captures creative and thoughtful responses to the challenges of contemporary graduate education. These examples demonstrate that excellence in graduate public relations education is not only achievable but is already taking place in pockets across our discipline. 

The Articles in This Issue 

The collection opens with research examining curriculum and standards insights provided by educators, followed by an audit of graduate program websites analyzing curricular offerings and assessing alignment with existing recommendations. These first two articles provide valuable empirical documentation of the current master’s-degree landscape and inform ongoing efforts by the Commission on Public Relations Education to revise and update standards. 

We are also pleased to feature an examination of practitioners’ expectations for graduate education, a timely survey that captures the voices of industry leaders and updates prior research in light of seismic shifts in practice brought about by the pandemic, technological advancement, and changing social dynamics. This research provides empirical grounding for conversations about what skills and knowledge matter most in contemporary professional contexts. 

This issue includes scholarship focused on inclusion, equity, and representation in graduate education, a critical imperative for our discipline. Research exploring the lived experiences of Black graduate students and faculty in public relations illuminates systemic challenges in recruitment, retention, and support. These insights are essential reading for all who work in graduate education and aspire to create more welcoming, affirming, and equitable learning environments. 

Additionally, we include research examining what industry professionals expect from graduate interns, the skills, competencies, and dispositions they value, and the gaps they perceive in graduate preparation. This work provides actionable guidance for program directors and faculty committed to strengthening the professional readiness of their graduates.

The last full article shares how public relations is presented, or absent, in sport management master’s programs. This work challenges us to consider whether our field maintains visibility and voice in related disciplines, and whether professionals in adjacent fields are being adequately prepared to leverage public relations expertise. 

Finally, this issue includes two teaching briefs. The first demonstrates the pedagogical value of service-learning in graduate research methods instruction, offering a practical model for educators who seek to bridge theory and application while fostering meaningful community partnerships. The second explores the creation of thought leadership articles by graduate students on LinkedIn. Such examples of class-tested project ideas are invaluable for faculty considering pedagogical innovation. 

Looking Forward 

As we reflect on this collection and consider its significance, we are struck by several observations. First, there is genuine consensus in these articles about what matters: graduate education must be intentional, theory-grounded, professionally relevant, and equitable. There is, however, less certainty about how to achieve these goals within the constraints of institutional structures, resource limitations, and competing pedagogical philosophies. That uncertainty reflects the genuine complexity of graduate education in an applied discipline. 

Second, the research findings within this issue reveal that graduate public relations education is not in crisis. It is in transition. Our programs are responding creatively and thoughtfully to changing contexts and emerging needs. Yet they would benefit from greater alignment, more explicit communication of their value propositions, and renewed commitment to standards that ensure quality and consistency without stifling innovation and specialization. 

Third, we are grateful that these articles attend carefully to issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion. As of late, and way too often, discussions of curriculum and standards abstract away from the human experiences of students, particularly students from historically marginalized communities. This issue reminds us that excellent graduate education is not only intellectually rigorous but also humane and affirming. 

We would be remiss if we did not mention the role our dear friend Pamela Bourland-Davis had in this issue – she aided in dreaming and scheming this idea. She was so enthusiastic about the potential of an entire issue of JPRE dedicated to *just* graduate education. Dr. Bourland-Davis, we dedicate this issue to you. We are certain your heart guided our work. 

We are also grateful to the authors who contributed their scholarship, the peer reviewers who provided constructive feedback, and the practitioner-partners who participated in the research and shared their insights. Finally, we thank the CPRE research committee and leadership team, as well as the JPRE editorial team, for their commitment to supporting this issue and advancing scholarship in public relations education. 

This special issue on graduate public relations education is offered in the spirit of generative dialogue. We hope this issue will spark conversations on campuses, in professional organizations, and in industry settings about what excellent graduate education in public relations looks like and how we, collectively, can ensure that our programs prepare the next generation of public relations leaders to navigate complexity, lead with integrity, and serve the public interest with wisdom and skill. 

As we move forward, may we do so together, committed to elevating the quality, relevance, equity, and impact of graduate public relations education. 

With warm regard and deep appreciation for our scholarly community, 

Drs. Kinsky, Lubbers, Wallace, & Bourland-Davis (in memoriam)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Letter from the Editors
Emily S. Kinsky, Chuck Lubbers, & Adrienne A. Wallace

ARTICLES

State of Public Relations Master’s Degree Education in the United States: 2025 Curricular Standards 
Hongmei Shen, Kenneth Plowman, & Melody Fisher

To Degree or Not to Degree: The Unclear Value and Expectations of Public Relations Graduate Education 
Stephanie Madden, Chelsea Woods, Kathleen Rennie, & Karla K. Gower

Public Relations Practitioners’ Expectations for Graduate Education 
Marlene Neill, Patrick Merle, & Anni Qiang

Appreciative but Battered: The Bittersweet Experiences of Former Black Public Relations Graduate Students 
Candice L. Edrington, Damion Waymer, Maryam Goli, & LaTonya Taylor

Shaping Future Professionals: Industry Perspectives on Graduate Internships 
Richard D. Waters, Elizabeth C. Ray, & Eldaneka Rolle

In the Lineup or on the Bench? Searching for PR in Sports Management Master’s Programs 
Betsy Emmons & Elizabeth S. Cox

GIFTS

GIFT: Graduate Instruction with Purpose: Theory Building and Community Engagement in Quantitative Methods Courses 
Virginia Harrison

GIFT: Demonstrating Course Competencies and Student Expertise through a Thought Leadership Assignment 
Laura Willis 

Read the Full Issue:

Shaping Future Professionals: Industry Perspectives on Graduate Internships

Editorial Record: Submitted August 7, 2025. Revised and accepted November 4, 2025.  

Authors

headshot of Richard Waters

Richard D. Waters
Assistant Professor
Florida State University
Florida, USA
Email: rdw22@fsu.edu

headshot of Elizabeth Ray

Elizabeth C. Ray
Assistant Professor
Florida State University
Florida, USA
Email: eray@fsu.edu

headshot of Eldaneka Rolle



Eldaneka Rolle

Ph.D. Student
Florida State University
Florida, USA

ABSTRACT

For graduate students in public relations, internships are essential in translating theory to practice. Their supervisors often presume they will deliver on day one, due to the depth of knowledge and experience gained as advanced degree seekers. However, there is increasing criticism that colleges may not provide them with enough practical preparation, as many pause that development at the undergraduate level. To explore how graduate programs can better prepare advanced students for industry expectations, semi-structured interviews were conducted with public relations experts. Results indicated that professionals are concerned about graduate students’ writing, interpersonal and networking abilities. Suggestions for curriculum improvements are discussed, along with future directions and limitations.   

Public Relations Practitioners’ Expectations for Graduate Education

Editorial Record: Submitted May 14, 2025. Revised and accepted November 20, 2025. 

Authors

headshot of Marlene Neill

Marlene S. Neill
Professor
Baylor University
Texas, USA
Email: Marlene_Neill@baylor.edu

headshot of Patrick Merle

Patrick Merle
Professor
Florida State University
Florida, USA
Email: pmerle@fsu.edu

headshot of Anni Qiang

Anni Qiang
Student
Baylor University
Texas, USA

ABSTRACT

Members of the Commission on Public Relations Education (CPRE) surveyed U.S. practitioners to assess needs for graduate education, specifically desired knowledge and skills. This study updates findings from an October 2012 report, particularly how the global pandemic and technology developments in the areas of Artificial Intelligence and video conferencing affect PR practitioners’ perceptions. The new study reveals the most desired areas of knowledge were crisis comunication and issues management, strategic communication in a digital environment, and ethics. The most desired skills included written and oral communication, strategic planning, and interpersonal communication. Results revealed lukewarm perceptions regarding the value of advanced degrees among lower-level and top managers, but some support for professional certifications, particularly in leadership and AI. Implications for graduate education are provided.  

To Degree or Not Degree: The Unclear Expectations of Public Relations Graduate Education

Editorial Record: Submitted August 7, 2025. Revised and accepted November 4, 2025. 

Authors

headshot of Stephanie Madden

Stephanie Madden
Associate Professor
Pennsylvania State University
Pennsylvania, USA
Email: szm962@psu.edu

headshot of Chelsea Woods

Chelsea Woods
Associate Professor
Virginia Tech University
Virginia, USA
Email: clwoods@vt.edu

headshot of Kathleen Rennie

Kathleen Rennie
Chair and Clinical Assistant Professor
New York University
New York, USA
Email: kathleen.rennie@nyu.edu

headshot of Karla Gower

Karla K. Gower
Behringer Distinguished Professor
University of Alabama
Alabama, USA
Email: gower@apr.ua.edu

ABSTRACT  

Over the last 25 years, scholars have periodically analyzed public relations graduate program websites to understand how these programs present themselves and structure their curricula. This body of research has consistently highlighted a lack of program uniformity across programs, despite recommendations such as those provided by the Commission on Public Relations Education’s (CPRE) 2012 report, Standards for a Master’s Degree in Public Relations: Educating for Complexity, which was its most recently published report focused on graduate public relations education. Building on this research, our study analyzes how public relations graduate programs currently present their curricula on their websites, with a focus on assessing alignment with the 2012 CPRE curricular report and identifying the various required and elective course offerings, as well as cumulative experiences. The findings reiterate the lack of curricular uniformity, suggest that the growing diversity in course offerings and titles may blur expectations for public relations graduate programs, and offer implications for a recommended core curriculum.  

In the Lineup or on the Bench? Searching for PR in Sports Management Master’s Programs

Editorial Record: Submitted August 7, 2024. Revised and accepted November 28, 2025.  

Authors

headshot of Betsy Emmons

Betsy Emmons
Associate Professor
University of Nebraska, Lincoln 
Nebraska, USA
Email: eemmons3@unl.edu

Elizabeth S. Cox
Assistant Professor
University of Kansas 
Kansas, USA
Email: escox@ku.edu

ABSTRACT

Sport management master’s programs are young and increasingly popular graduate programs at many United States universities. As public relations is a key employment area within sport organizations, this research reviewed whether public relations is taught at sport management master’s programs, and if so, what strategies and tactics were presented. Results indicated that a majority of sport management master’s programs included at least one course with public relations learning outcomes. However, PR management, strategy, and tactic presentation were inconsistent among programs, and some programs reported only an ancillary address of PR. Implications for more consistent and pedagogically-grounded PR learning outcomes are discussed, along with opportunities for curricular development bodies in PR to play more active roles in advising non-PR master’s programs on PR education. 

Appreciative but Battered: The Bittersweet Experiences of Former Black Public Relations Graduate Students

Editorial Record: Submitted August 8, 2024. Revised and accepted December 10, 2025.  

Authors

headshot of Candice Edrington

Candice L. Edrington
Assistant Professor
University of South Carolina
South Carolina, USA
Email: candicee@mailbox.sc.edu

headshot of Damion Waymer

Damion Waymer
Professor
University of South Carolina
South Carolina, USA
Email: dwaymer@mailbox.sc.edu

headshot of Maryam Goli

Maryam Goli
Ph.D. Student
University of South Carolina
South Carolina, USA
Email: mgoli@email.sc.edu

headshot of LaTonya Taylor

LaTonya Taylor
Ph.D. Candidate
University of Alabama
Alabama, USA
Email: ltaylor12@crimson.ua.edu

ABSTRACT

This study extends the scholarly literature that addresses diversity issues in public relations graduate education by focusing on the lived experiences of former Black graduate public relations students (all of whom were practitioners before full-time or part-time university teaching). By conducting in-depth interviews of nine participants, we assess the experiences they had in their graduate programs as well as how those experiences manifest in the relationships that they have (or had) with their Black graduate students. Results from this study provide practical insights that have the potential to assist public relations graduate programs in the recruiting and retaining of Black graduate students.   

GIFT: Graduate Instruction with Purpose: Theory Building and Community Engagement in Quantitative Methods Courses

Editorial Record: Submitted August 5, 2024. Revised and accepted December 4, 2025.

Author

Virginia Harrison

Virginia Harrison
Assistant Professor
Clemson University
South Carolina, USA
Email: vsharri@g.clemson.edu

ABSTRACT

This class-tested GIFT demonstrates the value of service-learning in an academic master’s degree quantitative methods course. Students in small groups developed a theory-driven research project to help a local nonprofit understand donation motivations among the undergraduate student body. The assignment required them to build public relations and communications theory while developing meaningful takeaways for the partner nonprofit. Students reported feeling less intimidated by quantitative methods, learning principles of scholarly research, and feeling good about helping their community. The nonprofit partner also said they valued the data collected by the students for their fundraising planning. The GIFT illustrates how a quantitative research assignment with a real-world application may serve a classroom of communication students who express different goals—either pursuing a Ph.D. or entering the profession—while benefiting town-gown relations. 

GIFT: Demonstrating Course Competencies and Student Expertise through a Thought Leadership Assignment

Editorial Record: Submitted August 6, 2025. Revised and accepted December 1, 2025.

Author

Laura Willis

Laura Willis
Associate Professor
Quinnipiac University
Connecticut, USA
Email: Laura.Willis@quinnipiac.edu

ABSTRACT

This teaching brief presents an end-of-course essay assignment that tasks graduate students to share their expertise publicly through a thought leadership-style article. Through stepping out of the role of “learner” and into the role of “expert” and publishing their articles on LinkedIn, students face the heightened stakes of sharing their insights beyond the classroom walls. By highlighting key knowledge, skills, and abilities they have gained through their graduate education, students can demonstrate the unique perspective and value they offer future employers while further developing their own professional brand. This assignment was developed for a course focused on accessibility, diversity, and inclusion on social media; however, the thought-leadership style essay can be adapted to fit the learning outcomes of many public relations courses.  

Special Issue Call for Papers – The Graduate Issue

Manuscript Due Date: 08/07/2025
Anticipated Publication: January 2026 JPRE 12(1)

Guest Editors

Emily S. Kinsky, West Texas A&M University
Charles Lubbers, University of South Dakota
Adrienne A. Wallace, Grand Valley State University
Pamela G. Bourland-Davis, Georgia Southern University (posthumously)


Since 1975, the Commission on Public Relations Education (CPRE) has studied undergraduate and graduate public relations education standards and practices, with the bulk of its effort being to lessen the gap between the profession and the academy at the undergraduate level. In 1999, the CPRE “Port of Entry” report addressed the university as the official “port of entry” for those who seek to make public relations a career, citing both undergraduate and graduate education as the tooling and retooling centers of the public relations profession. Then, the last official CPRE report on graduate education was released in 2012, “Standards for a Master’s Degree in Public Relations: Educating for Complexity.” With the growth of master’s-level public relations education in recent years and the splintering of methods, modes of delivery, theory, and practice, this special issue attempts to bridge the gap that exists in pedagogy related to PR graduate education with an issue solely dedicated to graduate education in public relations.

The purpose of this special issue call is to invite research articles, teaching briefs, scholarly and critical essays, and case studies, and we are especially interested in articles that explore BOTH the challenges and opportunities for public relations pedagogy focusing on graduate-level education in the public relations classroom. Submissions that offer practical knowledge and guidance for ONLY graduate public relations education are encouraged. We invite original submissions, and areas of focus could include but are not limited to:

  • How practitioner expectations align with graduate education
  • Best practices for internships in applied master’s programs
  • Applied theory at the graduate level
  • International approaches to graduate education
  • Developing research and data analytical abilities for practice
  • How graduate programs connect with the demands of the profession
  • Innovative approaches to graduate education (e.g., unique course offerings, new ideas for projects and assignments)
  • CEPR graduate-level certifications (e.g., tips, benefits)

Submission Guidelines
Submissions should follow the Author Guidelines on the JPRE website. Authors should include the special call name (SIGradPR) in parentheses after their manuscript title to indicate the submission is for this particular special call. Authors should submit their manuscript through Scholastica, the online submission system for JPRE. All submissions will be anonymously reviewed, following the guidelines of JPRE. Authors must use APA style for citations, references, tables, figures, and captions, plus follow the JPRE Styleguide. All identifying information must be deleted before full paper submissions.

Timeline with Key Dates
Deadline for full manuscript submission to JPRE’s Scholastica submission portal: https://jpre.scholasticahq.com/08/07/2025
Notification of review results, including invitations for revision and resubmission (R&R): August 2025
Deadline for R&R submission: 09/30/2025
Scheduled Publication: January 2026 12(1)

If you have any questions, please contact the guest editors for additional information.
Dr. Emily S. Kinsky, West Texas A&M University, ekinsky@wtamu.edu
Dr. Chuck Lubbers, University of South Dakota, chuck.lubbers@usd.edu
Dr. Adrienne A. Wallace, Grand Valley State University, wallacad@gvsu.edu